The World & I eLibrary
  Teacher's Corner
  World Gallery
Global Culture Studies (at homepage)
  Social Studies
  Language Arts
  Science
  The Arts
  Spanish
  Crossword Puzzle
  American Waves
  Eye on the High Court
  Fathers of Faith
  Footsteps of Lincoln
  Millennial Moments
  Profiles in Character
  Ceremonies/Festivities
  Peoples of the World
  Traveling the Globe
  Worldwide Folktales
  The U.S. Constitution
 

National Forensic League
Policy Debate
(2005 - 2006)


Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially decrease its authority either to detain without charge or to search without probable cause.

Given the times we live in, this is a critical debate issue, for it pits two "human rights" against one another: the right to a peaceful, well-protected society, and the right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable detention.

In an era of growing terrorist threat, it seems vital for law enforcers to have not only the tools but also unprecedented latitude to combat radical forces. By this line of reasoning, lawmen need greater search, surveillance, and detention powers.

Not so fast! cry critics, however. Lawmen, they say, are already well equipped technologically and legally to root out terrorists. No further expansion of their powers is necessary, for to do so will only diminish liberty in our land.

This collection will provide you with powerful factual ammunition for whichever side you take on the above resolution. Just click on the categories to find the information you need.






U.S. Security
Privacy and Rights
Government Powers
Terrorism
Surveillance
Intervention
Detainment
Immigration
Cases and Rulings
International Issues

 
About Us | Contact Us | FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2012 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.