The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Ukraine: A Quiet Revolution


Article # : 17697 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 6 / 1990  3,117 Words
Author : Taras Hunczak

       What does the future hold for the people of the Ukraine? As is evident with events in Lithuania, the process of change and of national self-assertion will, indeed, be difficult.
       
        The Ukraine, a republic of 52 million people, was subjected to a variety of historical experiences that nearly tore it apart. Except for a brief period of self-rule from 1917 to 1921 (and on limited territory at that), the Ukraine has been under a foreign rule for the last 250 years. The western portion of the Ukraine was rules first by the Poles and, after the first partition of Poland in 1772, by the Austrians. The Ukraine was gradually annexed by Russia which, with its autocratic system, converted an autonomous Ukrainian state into a number of imperial provinces. As a centralist state, the Russian Empire sought to introduce uniformity at the expense of national cultures and languages. The policy of Russification introduced by Peter I remains a landmark of Moscow's approach to the numerous minorities who found themselves within the empire. The Ukrainians were among the victims of this policy.
       
        The Polish and, subsequently, Austrian rule were more benign. Particularly since the middle of the nineteenth century, the Galician Ukrainians were able to develop institutions that provided an organizational framework for their cultural, economic, and, ultimately, political activity. It was essentially within the pluralist system of the Austro-Hungarian Empire that the Western Ukrainians developed a sense of national consciousness and political assertiveness. Hence, the Ukrainians entered the twentieth century divided not only by the borders of the Russian and the Austro-Hungarian empires but, even more importantly, by their knowledge, understanding, and attitude toward their past and, to some extent, their national identity. The Russian Empire, which prohibited even the use of the Ukrainian language and crushed every appearance of Ukrainian political aspiration, largely reduced the Ukrainian population to the status of an ethnic minority.
       
        The events of World War I and its aftermath provided an opportunity for the Ukrainians to express their political aspirations. This they did, establishing Ukrainian governments both on the East and West Ukrainian territories, which on January 22, 1919, were united into one Sovereign Ukrainian Republic. Obviously, the sense of common culture and common historical heritage was stronger than the artificial borders created by the two empires.
       
        When the Bolsheviks conquered the territory and incorporated it into the Soviet Union the Ukraine was already an identifiable entity. After a short period of national revival in the 1920s, the Ukraine was subjected by Stalin to horrendous repression and genocidal famine in 1932-33; as a result, some 10 million people perished. Now even the Soviet authorities admit that a famine of such unheard-of proportions actually did occur.
       
        World War II brought the people of the Ukraine suffering and devastation of epic proportions. As a result, the country lost some 14.5 million people, 7.5 million of whom were killed. (The others never returned.) After these losses, enough to break the spirit of most nations, the Soviet government under Stalin's successors unleashed an all-out effort against the national cultures, ostensibly trying to achieve intranationalism.
       
        Off to a slow
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.