The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

New Dimensions for Perestroika


Article # : 17694 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 6 / 1990  1,967 Words
Author : Larry Moffitt

       The problems and crises continue to mount for Moscow - food lines, rationing, Lithuanian independence, May Day protests, ethnic violence. Some observers wonder whether the Soviet Union can avoid political, economic, and social collapse. For every new brick that President Mikhail Gorbachev uses to restructure the Soviet empire, two old bricks seem to crack and crumble.
       
        When Gorbachev implemented free market reforms, impatient workers demanded higher wages and better conditions, weakening an already shaky economy. When the Soviet leader introduced glasnost, openness was used to criticize hem. When political reforms were introduced, a liberated Congress threatened to oust its newly elected president. When Gorbachev promised nonintervention in the internal affairs of his neighbors, his own republics demanded the same right.
       
        It is clear that Gorbachev must move his reforms in a radically new direction or the Soviet Union, with or without reforms, will topple and fall. One more Soviet revolution is needed, nonideological in character, different from any in the past, one that will bring the many peoples of the USSR together in a new union.
       
        Is such a revolution possible? No expert on either side of the Atlantic predicted the amazing events of 1989, and yet they came with stunning swiftness. Equally unpredictable was that communist and anticommunist leaders would come together in the spring of 1990 in the cause of world peace. Yet just such a meeting occurred in Moscow on April 11 when Mikhail Gorbachev, dedicated Leninist, confirmed atheist, and leader of the second most powerful nation on earth met Korean evangelist Sun Myung Moon, anticommunist, true believer, and head of the Unification Movement.
       
        The Gorbachev-Moon meeting was, in fact, more unexpected than Gorbachev's summits with President Ronald Reagan, his visits with Pope John Paul II or Czechoslovak President Vaclav Havel, or even his unofficial meeting with Polish Solidarity leader Lech Walesa. After all, Reagan, the pope, Havel, and Walesa are world figures with power and prestige, useful and important to Gorbachev in his continuing efforts to lead his country out of economic chaos and political authoritarianism.
       
        Why would Gorbachev take precious time to meet with a Korean anticommunist evangelist - one who had been internationally persecuted and imprisoned - when he is battered by one crisis after another in the Soviet Union?
       
        Some analysts have suggested that Gorbachev wanted to discuss the possibility of a giant business venture with Moon, similar to the $500 million "auto city" that Unification Movement businessmen are building in China. Yet while the Soviet Union has done business with dozens of foreign investors, none received a private meeting with the Soviet leader. In his meeting with Moon, Gorbachev did not ask for money but for understanding of the difficulties that he and the Soviet people confronted as they tried to reform an antiquated economy and a centralized political system.
       
        Other analysts speculated that the Gorbachev-Moon meeting was intended to persuade skeptics in the West that the Soviet leader was so moderating his Marxism-Leninism that he would even confer with one of the most outspoken anticommunists in the world. This may have been a
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2012 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.