The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Britain's Self-Inflicted Woes


Article # : 17553 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1990  1,162 Words
Author : Alan Reynolds

       Margaret Thatcher is currently facing the worst crisis of her career. Most of the problem arises from the government handling of economic issues such as inflation and the new poll tax. This is somewhat unfair or, at least, lacking in perspective, because, in fact, Britain has been enjoying its longest and strongest economic expansion in the postwar era. Before Thatcher, the anemic British economy was the object of international ridicule, with the phrase "British disease" symbolizing a society that was unduly generous about rewarding indolence and harshly punitive toward economic achievement.
       
        But the British economy began to show surprising vigor after the nation's highest tax rates were slashed from 83 percent to 40 percent between 1984 and 1987 and many subsidized state-owned enterprises were returned to the discipline of private competition. In the past six years, economic growth averaged 3.4 percent per year in the United Kingdom. That is almost twice as fast as the pace of British economic growth from 1971 to 1983, a full percentage point faster than in West Germany, and not far behind the equally unappreciated 4 percent growth rate of the U.S. economy.
       
        Economic growth did not produce Britain's current inflation - the country had higher inflation before Thatcher, with very little growth. Unless the inflation is properly understood and dealt with, it threatens to undermine the very impressive achievements that Britain has made in tax reform, deregulation, and privatization.
       
        A 10 percent inflation rate is what pushed Thatcher into office in 1979. With inflation back up to nearly 8 percent today, the same problem may be what eventually pulls her out of office as well. Thatcher's record low national approval rating of 25 percent is also blamed for many other seemingly unrelated issues: riots over the new poll tax, supposedly obsessive frugality regarding basic government expenditures, an unfashionable anxiety about national security, and a nationalistic inclination to keep Britain distant from the efforts to bring European economies into a common free trade and unified currency bloc by 1992. Despite the apparent diversity of these complaints, they actually share a common economic theme. Yet it is inflation that poses the greatest problem. Inflation is the excuse for keeping the budget in surplus, rather than spending more on schools and hospitals. Inflation is the reason that Britain would have trouble fitting into the currency and trade of the European Community. And inflation is connected to the poll tax in ways that are not commonly understood.
       
        Not A Voting Tax
       
        In abstract economic theory, a poll tax is not really such a bad idea, if Britain had been designing a new tax system from scratch. All adults between the ages of 18 and 65 in each community pay the same amount for local government services, usually the equivalent of a few hundred dollars a year. If that tax bill is higher than in other communities and government services are no better, this system provides both the information and the incentive for voters to elect a different set of local politicians. Moreover, a poll tax is "neutral," which means that it does not cause people to alter their behavior in order to avoid the tax. A steep marginal tax on added income, by contrast, encourage people to take more time off, take easier jobs, prefer "perks" to taxable income, avoid risk or relocation, and retire
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.