The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Securing the Far East


Article # : 15985 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1989  1,205 Words
Author : Kyudai Mineo

       In his speech at Vladivostok in 1986, General Secretary Gorbachev announced the unilateral reduction of conventional weaponry in Asia and promoted Soviet confidence-building measures.
       
        Gorbachev's speech clearly expressed the intent to remain a Pacific power. The Soviets' current strategy is to redeploy major military resources in Asia and to reestablish their military presence in the region.
       
        Since the 1970s, the Soviet Union has deployed 25 to 35 percent of its military might in Asia. The USSR's military strategy toward Western Europe is different than its strategy toward Asia. For example, land and air power hold major roles in Europe, but sea confrontation is of minor and supplemental importance. In Asia, however, the key battlefield would be the sea, and the Soviet Pacific Fleet's major confrontation would be with U.S.-Japanese sea forces--specifically, the U.S. Third Fleet, the Seventh Fleet, and Japan's Self-defense Sea Force.
       
        In the past, the Soviet Union viewed its sea power as a weak link in its defense. Consequently, the Soveit Far Eastern navy has been built up and modernized to compete with U.S. sea power. In the Pacific, the United States benefits from its vast network of international bases and facilities and can mobilize its navy freely. The Soviets' access to the Pacific is comparatively limited because their nearby straits are controlled by U.S. allies. Also, the Soviet Union's four fleets are totally separated by Eurasia and are difficult to merge because of their remoteness.
       
        But geographic conditions are not always a handicap for the Soviet Union. If the Soviet Far Eastern navy tries to enter the Pacific Ocean, its activities might be restricted by U.S. and Japanese forces, but the USSR could turn the closed Japan and Okhotsk seas to its strategic advantage.
       
        The Soviet Union believes that American antisubmarine warfare (ASW) plans go as follows:
       
        1. The U.S. aircraft carrier task force attacks Cam Ranh Bay and Soviet bases along the USSR's eastern coast.
       
        2. The Soviet Pacific fleet is defeated in the Japan Sea.
       
        3. The Soviet's nuclear-fueled ballistic-missile submarines (SSBN) in the Okhotsk are detected and destroyed.
       
        4. U.S. landing forces invade the Soviet Far East.
       
        In this scenario, Japan simultaneously blocks Soviet attack subs from entering the Pacific through the Soya or other straits. In the early stages of the conflict, the Soviet Union might deploy land forces in the northern part of Hokkaido to secure passage through the Soya. The Soviet Pacific fleet's main objective would be to deploy landing forces on Japan.
       
        The Soviet Union is very concerned about its sea-lane security. If Japan blocks the Tsushima Strait, the Soviets' sea-lane to the Indian Ocean would be threatened.
       
        Often forgotten is the fact that the USSR needs
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.