The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

The New Political Order in South Korea


Article # : 15786 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 1 / 1989  1,895 Words
Author : Martin L. Lasater

       POLITICAL CHANGE IN SOUTH KOREA
       Ilpyong J. Kim and Young Whan Kihl, eds.
       New York: Korean PWPA, 1988
       263 pp., $17.95
       
        Periodically in a nation's life, a moment arrives when the country stands at a historic crossroads to determine its future. Such a moment occurred in South Korea during 1986-88, when the Korean government and people elected to pursue a democratic political system despite a tradition of authoritarianism and unwillingness to compromise. Political Change in South Korea explores the background to this political crisis, examines the role played by major personalities and political institutions, and considers the impact of the crisis on the future of Korean politics.
       
        An edited volume of several contributors, most of its chapters are revised papers presented in a 1986 scholarly conference on political change in South Korea sponsored by THE WORLD& I and Professors World Peace Academy, Inc. A few chapters were subsequently added to reflect developments from fall 1986 through spring 1988.
       
        In a well-written overview surveying political challenges facing South Korea since the establishment of the Republic of Korea (ROK) on August 15, 1948, Kihl Young Whan argues that "Korea is a country in search of a new and stable political order." After reviewing the sometimes violent history of the First through Fifth republics (1948-1987), Kihl notes that for the first time in South Korea's history, a peaceful transition of power was made between outgoing President Chun Doo Hwan and newly elected Roh Tae Woo as a result of free elections held on December 16, 1987.
       
        Kihl clearly identifies the most important political dynamics at work in South Korea during the crucial 1986-87 period, as well as the principal actors. These included, of course, President Chun; Roh Tae Woo, Chun's chosen successor and head of the ruling Democratic Justice Party; opposition leader Kim Dae Jung, head of the Party for Peace and Democracy; opposition leader Kim Young Sam, head of the Reunification Democratic Party; and former Prime Minister Kim Jong Pil, head of the New Democratic Republican Party.
       
        In the December 16 election, Roh emerged as the winner with a plurality of 36.6 percent of the vote. Kim Young Sam and Kim Dae Jung won 28 percent and 27 percent respectively, and Kim Jong Pil received 8.1 percent of the vote. According to most analysts, Roh won the election because the opposition could not unify behind a single party or presidential candidate. Thus, despite the fact the opposition was able to pressure the government into accepting direct elections for the president, an opposition candidate did not win as expected. Because of the inability of any single party to win a clear majority, Kihl predicts that "South Korea's search for a new political order will not end."
       
        In his chapter on constitutional changes from the First to Sixth republics, Gregory Henderson outlines South Korea's frustrating search for a viable constitutional democracy. The problem, according to Henderson, has been the difficulty of reaching compromise between two firmly held points of view: the desire for security and social stability, emphasized by the military, and the desire for freedom and national unification, held most
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2012 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.