The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Pursuing Happiness--Too Easily


Article # : 15783 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 1 / 1989  3,430 Words
Author : Jeremy Rabkin

       IN PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS AND GOOD GOVERNMENT
       Charles Murray
       New York: Simon & Shuster 1988
       341 pp., $19.95
       
        Charles Murray is becoming more ambitious. And that makes him very ambitious indeed, both intellectually and politically.
       
        Murray's first book, Losing Ground (1981), was widely celebrated--and perhaps more widely denounced--as the intellectual inspiration for the social policies of the Reagan administration. The book offered much hard evidence that life in America's inner cities had deteriorated sharply in the 1960s and '70s, the very years when government was most intent on expanding welfare and antidiscrimination programs to deal with the problems of the ghetto. Murray insisted in Losing Ground that the two trends were directly related. The inner cities, he argued, would actually be less riven by crime and broken families, by declining educational attainments and rising unemployment, if government had done less to "help."
       
        In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government extends and generalizes this line of argument to a more comprehensive attack on contemporary social policy. Unlike his earlier work, however, this new book devotes little effort to documenting particular policy failures. It is not even very concerned with advancing particular policy proposals. It finally gets down to its one detailed policy prescription--a plea for a modified educational voucher system--only after an extended argument ranging from Aristotle and Locke to modern psychology and contemporary social statistics. The central aim of In Pursuit of Happiness is to revive the moral persuasiveness of Murray's general perspective on public policy, the perspective that views misdirected government programs as the problem in public policy and a sharp reduction in government as the solution.
       
        It is, in fact, an earnest, imaginative, and admirably nonpoliemical effort. And it certainly succeeds in reminding us why policy debate can never entirely escape the sort of fundamental philosophic questions it usually obscures or tries to assume away. Even critics on the left may find intriguing suggestions and seductive or gratifying formulations in this book. For conservatives, In Pursuit of Happiness will have special charms, for it offers new and imaginative rationales for the traditional political prejudices of American conservatives. But if conservatives may be most vulnerable to the charms of this work, they might do well to approach it with special caution. For all its insight, In Pursuit of Happiness finally seems to rest on a remarkably optimistic and simple view of human nature. It is a view that Murray tries throughout to associate with the framers of the American Constitution, but also one that the wisest of the American founders could never have endorsed as unreservedly as Murray does.
       
        A View of the Good Life
       
        Still, In Pursuit of Happiness makes a genuine contribution in pushing policy debate toward the right sorts of questions. Murray insists that social policy is too caught up in statistical data that does not capture our most fundamental concerns. In this, his argument seems at one level quite parallel to the arguments of George Gilder and other advocates of supply-side economics, who
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.