The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Eastern Europe: Two Case Studies in Nationalism


Article # : 15451 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 12 / 1989  6,994 Words
Author : R.V. Burks

       Basically there are two different kinds of nationalism in the Communist world. There is the nationalism of the party, which serves the interest of one-party rule as understood within the framework of Marxist-Leninist doctrine, and may or may not coincide with the national interests of the ruled. And there is the nationalism of the people, which reflects their interests as seen in the light of the traditional values of the folk, be they democratic, as in the case of Americans; autocratic, as with Russians; or theocratic, as currently best exemplified by the Iranians. Under long-term repression by communist regimes people-nationalism has often acquired an explosive character, as, for example, that of the Hungarians in 1956, the Czechs in 1968, and the Poles in 1956, 1968, 1970, 1976, and 1980.
       
        Historically, the nation is an outgrowth of the extended family, with all living together in a huge, single household, the eldest brother serving as undisputed master not only of his immediate family but also of his brothers, their wives, and their children. In the past, two or three extended families were typically joined in clans whose members believed themselves to be lineal descendants of the same distant, often mythical, ancestor. As a rule, clans had the responsibility of maintaining order among and between themselves by the one method they understood: the vendetta or blood feud, which tolerated reciprocal killings in punishment for criminal acts until such time as both parties were ready for a negotiated settlement. Clans also banded together for protection in tribes whose leaders were men of military prowess, the tribe serving as the unit of defense. In Western Europe in the Middle Ages, tribal chieftains became kings and with the technological changes of the late Middle Ages--the longbow, the crossbow, the pike, and the cannon--which made it feasible to organize masses of ordinary men for battle, national consciousness began to appear, the notion that all the people of a certain territory owed loyalty to each other and to their sovereign ruler, including the obligation of adult males to military service when the country was endangered. With the development of modern communications in the nineteenth century, it was further understood that all members of a given nation had the ability to communicate in the same language and together cherished a common belief in the virtue and reasonableness of their distinctive way of life. In Europe, national feeling had already emerged on the western seaboard during the late Middle Ages; only in the nineteenth century, however, did it surface among such peoples as the Germans, the Italians, and the Poles.
       
        Political oppression, economic disaster, or military defeat will often produce nationalist outbursts, such as we have seen in Eastern Europe after World War II. In short, nationalism signifies the desire, right, and effort of any given people to protect its vital interests, including its independence, its prosperity, and its traditional way of life.
       
        A communist party in power, on the other hand, is in fact a ruling class, one formally guided in its policy-making by a specific doctrine, that of Marxism Leninism. Yet members of the Romanian Communist Party do not by their membership cease to the Romanians in most other ways. Today, for example, the Romanian party is attempting to force its rural population to abandon their age-old villages and live instead in newly founded agricultural cities, partly in order to bring about the forced assimilation of the sizable Hungarian minority which inhabits the Romanian province of Transylvania as a compact aggregation and is the
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.