The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Poland Speaks


Article # : 15259 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 8 / 1989  2,511 Words
Author : Joshua Muravchik

       As returns began to roll in at Solidarity election offices around Poland on June 4, weeks of tension gave way to joy but then quickly turned to fear. The joy flowed from the sweeping victory that Solidarity-backed candidates had won in Poland's first genuine election under communist rule. The fear flowed from the astonishing margin of that victory, dealing the communist government a defeat so humiliating that some Solidarity activists could not believe the authorities would allow the count to be completed and announced. Perhaps instead the government would tear a page from Panamanian ruler Manuel Noriega's book and simply abort the election. These fears, fortunately, proved unfounded. Honorably, the authorities swallowed their bitter pill, feeling, in the words of Central Committee member Janusz Reykowski, "like soldiers of a defeated army."
       
        The margin of the outcome shocked the opposition as well as the government. During the brief campaign Solidarity activists had worried that the election was as much a trap as an opportunity. They faced huge logistical hurdles without the time to overcome them. This, as they say in the communist world, was no accident. During the hard bargaining of last spring's "roundtable" talks, government negotiators made many concessions, but one item on which they would not budge was the early date for elections--less than two months from signing the agreement. When asked why he was so adamant about holding the election quickly, the chief government negotiator (also the interior minister) said, "I want to win them."
       
        The authorities processed elaborate machinery for communicating, mounting a campaign, and organizing their supporters--offices, equipment, staff, publications, and party structure. The opposition lacked all of these things, except publications, scores of which have flourished in the Polish underground in recent years, but even these included none of mass circulation. The challenge it now faced was to organize a nationwide campaign in 150 districts and to train volunteers without the use of such elementary amenities as telephones and coping machines.
       
        During a visit to Poland just a month before the election, I found opposition activists almost uniformly pessimistic about its outcome. They did not fear that they would lose outright, but they doubted they would win the kind of decisive victory that would vindicate their position. The doubts rose both from their daunting material disadvantages and also, it seemed, from uncertainty about the true dimension of their popular support. Before the election, they could gauge their support only on the basis of the numbers of people willing to turn out for demonstrations or to take part in other illegal activities. This led the activists to overestimate the cynicism of the populace.
       
        Organizing a party
       
        The opposition's first and most pressing need was for some kind of political structure. All opposition parties had been suppressed 40 years ago when the communists took power (except for some rump bodies co-opted by the communists as part of their "salami tactics" that have served in "coalition" with them ever since). Solidarity is the opposition's only mass organization, but it is a labor union, not a party, and is determined to maintain that distinction. Its leaders recognized, however, that only it could provide an infrastructure for the opposition's election campaign.
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.