The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Tracking the East-West Lineup


Article # : 15001 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 9 / 1988  1,115 Words
Author : James L. Payne

       Where does the United States stand in the world? Who are its friends, and who are its opponents? A systematic study of voting patterns in the United Nations enables us to go beyond rough impressions and achieve a precise, comprehensive answer. With this quantitative technique, it is interesting to see not only which countries are hostile, but which types of countries regularly side against the United States.
       
        For the past four years, the U.S. delegation at the United Nations has selected 10 key votes that measure the support countries around the world give to U.S. values and purposes. It wasn't the State Department's idea to initiate this tabulation. At Foggy Bottom, they prefer to believe that everyone in the world is friendly--perhaps an understandable orientation for diplomats. But congressmen, disturbed at the way certain countries were biting the hand that was aiding them, ordered the compilation to be made. The resulting reports yield a comprehensive picture of the loyalties of different countries around the world.
       
        The accompanying table gives the voting on these key issues for the past four UN sessions, 1983-86. The key votes are selected by the U.S. delegation and the State Department as especially important to the United Sates--votes on which the United States actively lobbied all member states, not only at the United Nations, in New York, but through the U.S. embassies in each nation's capital. They covered a broad range of major East-West issues, including U.S. policy in connection with Grenada, El Salvador, Nicaragua, South Africa, Namibia, Israel, and Libya, as well as Soviet policy in Afghanistan and Kampuchea, and the use of chemical and biological warfare agents in these areas.
       
        To make a more accurate East-West scale, attention is confined to those 36 votes on which the United States and the Soviet Union voted oppositely. (On the four other votes, the Soviet Union either voted with the United States or abstained). Of these 36 votes, a country is given +1 for each time it voted with the United States, -1 for each time it voted against the United States (and with the Soviet Union), and a zero for each abstention or absence. Hence, a score of +36 represents complete agreement with the United States, while a score of -36 means complete disagreement (and agreement with the Soviet Union). Excluded from the tabulation are micro-countries, dependencies, governments in exile, and nonmembers of the United Nations.
       
        Aid and the Vote
       
        The finding that stands out most clearly in the tabulation is the consistent anti-U.S. stance of the Marxist countries. Of the 28 Marxist-Leninist countries, many appear on the anti-American side, such as Guinea-Bissau (-9), Guyana (-11), Madagascar (-20), and Laos (-35). Despite U.S. loans to Marxist Poland, its government is strongly anti-American (-34). Decades of U.S. aid and support for Marxist Yugoslavia have not moved that country form the minus column. Albania claims to hate the Soviet Union, which it regards as a betrayer of the Marxist cause, yet it is still relatively pro-Soviet and anti-American (-12). Recent U.S. help for the Marxist rulers of Mozambique has had little effect on their anti-American stance (-22).
       
        The one exception to the pattern, Somalia, indicates how powerful the Anti-American undertow is for a Marxist regime. Since 1977, Somalia has been at war with
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.