The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Southern California Triumphant: The Architecture of Frank Gehry


Article # : 14825 

Section : THE ARTS
Issue Date : 10 / 1988  2,504 Words
Author : Shira Rosan

       The architecture of Frank Gehry is the architecture of possibility. Created and nurtured in Southern California, America's Golden West where the sun never sets and everyone gets a second chance, Gehry's is an architecture that believes in the present and the future. The recent retrospective of The Architecture of Frank Gehry, on display at the Whitney Museum through October 2, provides a through, complete, and well-documented view of the work to date of this important and influential American architect.
       
        This retrospective comes at an interesting time in Gehry's career. The concerns that have informed his architecture over the past quarter century are giving way now to others, some still to be defined. The opportunity to pause and look back at this point, bringing the past into sharper focus before moving on, is a rare one.
       
        Unlike Early Modernists
       
        The work of Frank Gehry is in many ways outside the Modernism/Post-Modernism debate of recent times. Unlike the early modernists, Gehry claims that his architecture is not intended to change the world and that the work he does is crucial to no one except himself and his client. Unlike the Post-Modernists, he does not reach into the past for iconography, and his kind of contextualism, although subtle, is much broader than the historicizing applique work of which we have seen so much in the last decade. Gehry finds certain issues consistently compelling and faces them head-on, with changing emphasis but continuing intensity.
       
        One of these recurring issues is the idea of process, which in Gehry's work carries two meanings. The first is the architectural process itself. Gehry is interested in revealing the building process in the finished product--a modernist notion. But while modern architecture has been content to give clues to the location and nature of building elements, Gehry exposes them wholesale. Thus in the Gehry, Famillian, and Norton houses, for example, wood-stud framing is left exposed and sometimes even placed under glass, the better to call attention to it simultaneously as structure and sculpture. Plywood, a material usually covered over in the final building, is often used as a cladding material in Gehry's work. Typical of his office's approach to materials, he has researched different types of plywood and chosen to use a Finnish product whose beauty changes our perception of the material.
       
        The other process that captures Gehry's attention is the social process, the process of inhabiting his work. This concern reveals in Gehry the existence of a social conscience based less, one suspects, on the noblesse oblige of the early modernists than on a genuine interest in and fondness for his fellow humans. The relationship of the restrained fa?de of the classroom building at Loyola Law School to the exuberantly angled staircases bursting from it is a precise analogy to the behavior of students during and between classes. This is form following function in a new way. Similarly, at the Rouse Company headquarters--an early work, from the days before his reputation or direction were so firmly established--Gehry designed partition systems but did not design or choose furniture. Rather, he encouraged the company to reuse its existing furniture; he wanted the users to personalize; he wanted the users to personalize their spaces. Many architects shudder at what happens to their buildings once messy and unpredictable clients acutally begin to use them.
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2010 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.