The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

U.S. Labor Battles Over World Affairs


Article # : 13958 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1988  3,503 Words
Author : A.H. Raskin

       At top-secret meetings of organized labor's high command, no challenges precipitated by plant shutdowns, mass layoffs, or employer-sponsored unionbusting stir nearly as much angry division as do debates over AFL-CIO policy on international affairs.
       
        The emotion labor's upper echelon invests in wrangling over convoluted AFL-CIO pronouncements on flash points between the superpowers such as "Star Wars" and aid to the Nicaraguan Contras may seem strange for an organization that remains curiously lethargic in its efforts to unionize the five American workers out of every six who are still unorganized.
       
        This apparent disproportion in the intensity of summit-level union involvement in foreign policy is easier to understand when one remembers that, in the quarter-century of George Meany's imperious reign as "Mister Labor," including the turbulent years of the Vietnam War, the federation was the most forceful voice outside the White House and the Pentagon in support of United States Cold War positions.
       
        Indeed, Meany's disenchantment with the Nixon presidency was sparked in large measure by Nixon's 180-degree turn toward fraternization with the Soviet Union and Communist China. "This was the Number One anticommunist that the country had," Meany used to say. "I know because I was Number Two." Those were the days when Meany's hard-hatted constituents expressed their patriotism by picking up wrenches and staves and chasing long-haired Vietnam War protesters through the canyons of New York's financial district.
       
        Lane Kirkland, the soft-spoken union technocrat who was Meany's handpicked successor in 1979, is no less fervent than his mentor in abhorring communism as a totalitarian suppressor of democracy and human rights. Kirkland's own mistrust of Soviet good intentions, however seductively put forward, is reinforced by his wife's experiences. Irena Kirkland, a Czech-born Israeli, developed a passionate hatred for all forms of totalirianism as a World War II prisoner in two Nazi concentration camps and, after her postwar return to Czechoslovakia, as a prisoner again for resisting Moscow's puppet government in Prague.
       
        Conciliation and compromise
       
        But among the princes and potentates of unionism who comprise the 36-member Executive Council of the AFL-CIO, Kirkland has never been able to exercise the iron control that Meany regularly commanded by sheer force of personality. Consultation, conciliation, and compromise are the tools Kirkland has wielded skillfully over the last nine years to maintain a high degree of unity on pivotal issues among the often fractious leaders of the federation's major unions.
       
        In foreign affairs, the quest for consensus has obliged Kirkland to retreat substantially from the policies that traditionally made the AFL-CIO a mainstay of the forces lobbying for ever-bigger defense budgets and uncompromising resistance to Soviet expansionism, whatever its guises.
       
        The federation's hard line against world communism started softening long before Mikhail Gorbachev began beguiling the West with glasnost. In fact, the change has much less to do with the twists and turns in Kremlin policy or even the December love-fest in
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2010 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.