The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Uganda's Struggle to Break With the Past


Article # : 12515 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1987  2,814 Words
Author : Oliver W. Furley

       Until the British established a protectorate, Uganda was not one country but many: The area consisted of four kingdoms and a number of ethnic groups organized along differing segmentary lines. The centralized kingdoms were in the South, and the people in the south generally belonged to the Bantu-speaking groups, who had little linguistic, ethnic, or cultural affinity with the taller, darker Nilotic groups in the North. Much has been written about this North-South divide in Uganda. It is sometimes exaggerated, but it is always there, and it still poses perhaps the greatest problem for Yoweri Museveni's government today.
       
        The British compounded the difficulties by favoring the kingdoms, and according them special self-governing privileges, in the system of "indirect rule." The central kingdom of Buganda, especially, had a formal agreement with the British granting them semiautonomy and a special status within the protectorate. They remained a state within a state, headed by their Kabaka (king), and at the time of independence would have preferred to break off and form their own nation-state, sloughing off the poorer, less developed areas of Uganda.
       
        This strong political separatism of the Buganda people has always presented a major obstacle to the postindependence governments of Uganda in building up a spirit of national unity. Museveni can approach it in a different way, because for the first time the government is predominantly "southern" in its personnel and its support, but whether Buganda aspiration can be contained within it remains to be seen. Already there have been pleas to restore the Kabakaship and put Prince Ronald Mutebi on the throne. Museveni has allowed him back in the country but has firmly forbidden talk of a restoration of the monarchy.
       
        Royalist sentiments, however, are not to be discounted and can be latched on to other political grievances at any time.
       
        Another troublesome historical legacy is the pattern of military recruitment. The British had the notion that only certain ethnic groups made the best soldiers and recruited for the King's African Rifles almost exclusively from the northerners - Acholi, Langi, and West Nilers, the "martial races" of Uganda. Milton Obote, the first ruler of independent Uganda, was himself a Langi and continued that process. So of course did Idi Amin. Museveni's guerrilla force, which has now taken over, was the first predominantly southern military force in this century. It triumphed, but the result has been a large remnant of disaffected northern soldiers in northern Uganda and southern Sudan who continue to threaten the new regime and reimpose the old order of northern military predominance.
       
        The unequal distribution of economic wealth and development poses another thorny problem for Museveni. When the British introduced cash crops, they found that the highly profitable cotton crop grew best in the southern and eastern regions, and peasant farmers in Buganda and Eastern Province became richer than most people in East Africa. Coffee was even more successful, but again needed the lush climate of the South. The barren, arid regions of the North could not compete, and indeed the colonial government encouraged this economic imbalance, in which the North became merely the labor supply for the South. The result was that the whole process of modernization, involving the spread of a cash economy, the growth of towns, an infrastructure of services,
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.