The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

The Sleep of Reason


Article # : 12482 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 7 / 1987  2,652 Words
Author : Peter Shaw

       IMPORTANT NONSENSE
       Lionel Abel
       Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1987
       232 pp., $22.95
       
        Lionel Abel has been an intimate witness to some of the most important intellectual and artistic developments of our time. He knew the leading intellectuals in New York when Marxism flowered in the thirties. During World War II he met the émigré Europeans who were profoundly influencing American styles of thought. After the war he was in Paris among the group that developed existentialism. Back in New York in the 1950s, he was in renewed contact with the abstract expressionist painters whose revolution triumphed in that decade. In the early 1960s, as a playwright and again an intimate of those forging a new movement, he participated in the birth of Off-Broadway theater and the Theatre of the Absurd.
       
        Abel's account of these experiences appeared a few years ago in his memoir, The Intellectual Follies. Now, Important Nonsense offers his account of intellectual developments from the early sixties to the present in the form of essay written during the period. An essay on comedy and one on Sophocles carry forward the drama criticism of Abel's Metatheatre (1963).
       
        Abel has arranged the essays of Important Nonsense neither in the order he wrote them nor by category. As a result, he has staked out less claim to attention as a cultural critic than he might have. He contents himself with suggesting in a brief, offhand preface that the essays exposed some of the "important nonsense" of our period. His purpose has been to cast a skeptical eye over thinkers and ideas of the times and to analyze their limitations. And it seems fair to say that in this somewhat casual, belletristic intention can be found both Abel's considerable strengths and his self-imposed limitations as an essayist.
       
        A Prophetic Grasp of the 1960s
       
        If one makes a chronological rearrangement of Abel's essays, there emerges a powerful, even prophetic grasp of how the culture and politics of our time were transformed in the early 1960s. For example, writing in Dissent in 1966, a few years after the Broadway production of Peter Weiss's play The Persecution and Assassination of Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum at Charenton under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade, Abel put his finger on how the run of that play contributed to the atmosphere of the times. His essay, "Who's Not Mad? On Marat/Sade and Nihilism" studied the critics, the audience, and director Peter Brook's dramaturgy as much as the play itself. Abel was especially concerned with the climax, during which the inmates of the insane asylum that holds de Sade during the French Revolution break out and cavort about the stage. At this moment, he observed, "there was an unmistakable feeling of solidarity with them on the part of the audience." Abel recognized in this feeling the beginning of a widespread sympathy for the combination of madness and revolutionary sympathies that would emerge within a few years as the cultural style of the late 1960s. In fact, contained in the audience's identification with the madness on stage, as Abel put it, was "the depth of the contemporary situation." He went on to argue persuasively that audiences and critics of the play had suffered a failure of taste not only in their enthusiasm for this scene, but in their overvaluing the play as
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.