The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Proxies: The Long Arm of Soviet Foreign Policy


Article # : 12212 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1987  2,738 Words
Author : Paul Seabury

       One feature of the "struggle over peace" since the Bolshevik Revolution has been the Soviets' use of proxy forces to advance their interests. In the interwar years, when the Soviets' capacity to project power was much more confined than today, their chief assets were the Comintern, local parties, and front organizations. Recently, however, Soviet proxy operations have grown to proportions few could have imagined decades ago. As the proxy system has grown, it has become more difficult for observers and analysts to grasp its entirety. From time to time, analysts have well understood pieces of it - such as Soviet proxy operations in Angola, Ethiopia, and Yemen. Party and government documents seized by the United States in Grenada provide vivid glimpses of the dynamics of the proxy system on that little island during the New Jewel period. Proxy operations sponsored by the Soviets in southern Lebanon have been well documented in PLO materials seized and published by the Israelis after their invasion of that region in 1982. Information collected by Italian authorities after the attempt upon the pope have thrown much light upon proxy terrorist activities in Europe - notably, the "Bulgarian connection."
       
        The terrorist networkings now are sufficiently known to show their lineage in great detail. For instance, Sadinista Marxists were trained by the PLO in southern Lebanon before they returned to Central America. Others were trained in Cuba. The Cuban and PLO camps were established with help from the Soviets, East Germany, and Czechoslovakia. Similar camps have been established in Nicaragua since the Sandinistas seized power.
       
        Early on, observers of Soviet proxy operations in Africa and the Middle East noted a functional division of labor among proxies - those bloc states and fronts which aided the Soviet struggle for "national liberation," and the consolidation of Marxist regimes. While Soviet forces normally remained behind the scenes, the role of consolidating police-state power fell to the East Germans, who instructed and controlled local elements in developing concentration camp and internal security police. Cuban troops were cannon fodder and other proxies had other specific functions. One might call this the "socialist division of labor," since the pattern has held both in East and West Africa. Our knowledge of Soviet proxy operations in South Africa today is still, in public print primitive; African National Congress (ANC) military and terrorist operations appear to be headquartered in Addis Ababa. Little is publicly known of the methods and location of training sites for professional ANC cadres, although some surmise them to be in Ethiopia.
       
       
        Soviet satellite states
       
        Long lists of such participants in the proxy system could be recited. But here is one critical observation: New to the proxy system since the 1930s is the participation of communist states and, in particular, Soviet satellite states.
       
        Few analysts ponder the interrelations among the Soviet satellite states; instead, there is an inclination to concentrate upon particulars, especially ones which erupt into great local crises. Thus, we are ill-informed as to the strategic interrelations among them and how they are coordinated and funded. We are ill-informed about their frictions and, most of all, their various incentives, spirits, and commitments - in other words, how they relate to each other.
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.