The Interdisciplinary Resource  
  Subscribe
Login
 
 
     
Search  
Sort by:
Results Listed:
Date Range:
  Advanced Search
 
The World & I eLibrary

Teacher's Corner

World Gallery

Global Culture Studies (at homepage)

 
 
Social Studies

Language Arts

Science


The Arts

Spanish
 
 
Crossword Puzzle
 
 
American Indian Heritage
American Waves
Biographies
Ceremonies/Festivities
Diversity in America
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Genes & Biotechnology
Impacts
Media in Review
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Poetry
Point/Counterpoint
Profiles in Character
Science and Spirituality
Shedding Light on Islam
Speech & Debate
The Civil War
The U.S. Constitution
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
World of Nature
Writers & Writing

 

Assessing the Results of the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union


Article # : 10030 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1986  2,234 Words
Author : Alexander Shtromas

       Nothing has happened at the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) that was either unexpected or not predicted--no coups or secret speeches, no revelations or special resolutions. The Congress has proceeded in a regular and orderly manner, praisingly discussing and then unanimously adopting without substantial changes the documents published and widely publicized well before the Congress. When I asked one Soviet colleague about his impressions of the Congress, his quick and rather apt response was--"ten days of emptiness."
       
        Indeed, the widely expected change in the membership of the Central Committee--the party's supreme ruling body in between Congresses--was, in fact, not a change at all, for its structure, based on representation of central and local bodies of authority, intermingled with a handful of grass-roots party members, remained exactly the same as it was in Brezhnev's time. Only the faces have changed--true, quite a lot of them, around 40 percent or so--but they were known already beforehand as the new appointees to those officers qualifying for Central Committee membership.
       
        There was not much change in the Politburo either. Only one new full member, Lev Zaikov, recently promoted from the secretaryship of the Leningrad Party organization to that of the Central Committee, was selected and a slight reshuffling took place among the candidate members: two octogenarians, Boris Ponomarev and Vasili Kuznetsov, were removed, and leaders of the Leningrad and Byelorussian Party, Yuri Solovyev and Nicolai Slyun'kov, were promoted. The most significant changes took place in the secretariat of the Central Committee, whose long-depleted ranks were at last replenished by five new members replacing only the outgoing Boris Ponomarev.
       
        On the whole, these non-spectacular changes are significant for having streamlined and normalized the organization of work within the party's leadership. The anomaly of having only one person, apart from the General Secretary himself, combining the positions of full Politburo member and secretary of the party's Central Committee--an anomaly that arose after Nicolai Ryzhkov was moved in July 1985 from the Central Committee's secretaryship to the chairmanship of the Soviet Union's council of Ministers--has been eliminated. Now, as was always the case before, a team of three senior secretaries--the general secretary, Mikhail Gorbachev, the secretary for ideology and external affairs, Yegor Ligachev, and the secretary for economic and other internal affairs, Lev Zaikov--is in place, dividing among themselves all the functions of running the Soviet Union. The five newly appointed junior secretaries have taken charge of their respective departments, and together with the ones already in place, work under the guidance of the three senior colleagues mentioned above. Traditional representation of regions in the Politburo was mainly restored, too, although on the lower level of candidate membership for "both capitals," Moscow (the newly selected party boss of Moscow, Boris Yeltsin, was elevated to candidate membership of the Politburo just before the congress) and Leningrad.
       
        Questioning Gorbachev
       
        But what is the meaning of the Congress in terms of the concentration and distribution of political power in the Soviet Union? Has, for example, Gorbachev's personal power been consolidated by the first Congress conducted under his leadership, and if it was, to what extent? I
... Read Full Article
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.